The electoral college limits voter fraud. The candidate who wins a state wins its electors, and those people—called the Electoral College—actually vote for the president.. The Electoral College was created by the Founding Fathers of the United States to uphold democracy, but for many years, this system has come under criticism. Arguments in Favor of the Electoral College. Opponents of the Electoral College are further concerned about its possible role in depressing voter turnout . Their argument is that, since each State is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the States to encourage voter participation. Here's a video looking at every common argument in favor of it and shows why they are wrong. The electoral college is far broken than repair, and by replacing it we’ll achieve the benefits of direct popular vote. Wallison concluded that the Electoral College is an elegant solution to the legitimacy issue that doesn’t require constitutional amendments and partisan sparring. The electoral college gives small states more weight in the political process than their population would otherwise confer. Indeed, there may even be an incentive to If you think you have one, what is it? Note: A version of this post with more recent data can be found here.. A majority of U.S. adults (58%) say the Constitution should be amended so the presidential candidate who receives the most votes nationwide wins, while 40% prefer to keep the current system in which the candidate who receives the most Electoral College votes wins the election. If you don't, state whatever case you want regarding the electoral college. Electoral College POLICY BIG IDEAS ... to favor Congress, ... oral arguments from candidates. Proponents of the system argue that it forces candidates to appeal to the nation as a whole. In the electoral college there is a discrepancy in equality this creates negative … Now the Electoral College benefits the Republican Party almost ... and they vote about 60/40 in favor of the Republicans. Proposals to eliminate the Electoral College, or to do an “end run” with the popular vote compact, would eliminate these checks and balances in favor of a simple majority. 1. You’ll hear these 4 arguments in defense of the Electoral College – here’s why they’re wrong March 27, 2019 6.33am EDT • Updated August 16, 2019 11.37am EDT Robert Speel , Penn State On the other hand, many people do still believe the Electoral College is the best system for electing the president. Arguments in Favor of the Electoral College. These arguments may seem plausible. Electoral College that presidential nominees are inclined to select vice presidential running mates from a region other than their own. But it has stood the test of time. According to experts, it is the Electoral College that actually decides who will secure the office, not the voters in the United States. I’ll get back to them below. It doesn’t matter if 12 points come from 1 inning if you outscore your opponent, you earned the victory. Pitfalls of Popular Vote. In the Electoral College, Trump was granted 306 votes to Clinton's 232. Electoral college defenders argue that without the electoral college, candidates will spend all their time trying to rack up big victories in big cities with big media, ignoring the rest of the voters. The Electoral College system, long a source of controversy, came under especially heavy criticism after the 2016 presidential election when Republican Donald Trump lost the nationwide popular vote to Democrat Hillary Clinton by over 2.8 million votes but won the Electoral College—and thus the presidency—by 74 electoral votes. The Electoral College is not perfect—no election system is. Here is a list of every argument for against electing presidents by national popular vote – and why all of them are wrong. The 2016 election ought to put an end to this argument forever. By abolishing the electoral college, we would be improving our democracy. The Electoral College is not a safety valve meant to … The electoral college, proponents say, makes U.S. presidential elections less contentious by providing a clear ending. But this objection also proves too much. 5 Arguments for the Electoral College. Arguments Against the Electoral College Those who object to the Electoral College system and favor a direct … The United States Electoral College is the group of presidential electors required by the Constitution to form every four years for the sole purpose of electing the president and vice president.Each state appoints electors according to its legislature, equal in number to its congressional delegation (senators and representatives). I’ve heard all the arguments in favor of the Electoral College, and in my humble opinion they are lame, bordering on laughable. Many have complained that the Electoral College is outdated, undemocratic and fails to represent the will of the people. Number 3: The Media Argument. Some people think this system is unfair. A month after the 2016 election, and on the day the members of the Electoral College met to cast their official votes, the New York Times editorial board published a scathing attack of this sort, calling the Electoral College an "antiquated mechanism" that "overwhelming majorities" of Americans would prefer to eliminate in favor of a direct, national popular vote. On December 10, in a landmark 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court This article seeks to Why or why not? Nobody would be in favor of that, and nobody should be in favor of the electoral college. By the 1820s, most states began to pass laws allowing voters, not state legislatures, to choose electors on a winner-take-all basis. The very same thing might be said of the California governor's election. The process rewards coalition-building and prevents nationwide recounts. Today, in every state except Nebraska and Maine, whichever candidate wins the most votes in a state wins all the electors from that state, no matter what the margin of victory. The electoral college needs to go. ( Note: If students already have a strong foundation in this topic, start the lesson at Part 2.) In normal years, the Electoral College is often considered a formality in the election process for the office of president. Many arguments for keeping the Electoral College in place poke holes in arguments made for popular vote elections. If we abandoned the Electoral College, and adopted a system in which a person could win the presidency with only a plurality of the popular votes we would be swamped with candidates. Do you favor replacing the Electoral College with direct popular election of the president? Pro #2: It provides a clean, widely accepted ending to the election (most of the time). It is sometimes reported that Richard M. Nixon received more popular votes in the 1960 election than winner John F. Kennedy , but official results showed Kennedy with 34,227,096 popular votes to Nixon's 34,107,646. But in reality, they are specious, ahistorical, and counterproductive. Every four years, Americans participate in a presidential election. Since most states tend to dependably support either Democrats or Republicans, opponents say the current system also confines most campaigning to a handful of “swing” states. Electoral College and the current debate surrounding the outcome of the 2016 election. So far I've yet to see a single compelling argument for the electoral college's legitimacy as a democratic system. The Founders who sat in the 1787 Constitutional Convention lavished an extraordinary amount of argument on the electoral college, and it was by no means one-sided. 5. The Electoral College was first conceived in 1787, at the Constitutional Convention. Calls to scrap the Electoral College have mounted since the 2016 election became the second in 16 years to see a presidential candidate elected without winning the popular vote. However, we do not vote for president. Electoral College in favor of a nationwide popular election for president would strike at . With the rise of the two-party system, the modern Electoral College continued to evolve. But there are also staunch defenders of the Electoral College who, though perhaps less vocal than its critics, offer very powerful arguments in its favor. Without it, people would have a … Rather, we vote for electors who represent our state in a second round of voting. For example, Nixon in 1968 and Clinton in 1992 both had only a 43 percent plurality of the popular votes, while winning a majority in the Electoral College (301 and 370 electoral votes, respectively). Federal office holders cannot be electors. The Electoral College is widely regarded as an anachronism, a nondemocratic method of selecting a president that ought to be superseded by declaring … The debate over the continued use of the Electoral College resurfaced during the 2016 presidential election, when Donald Trump lost the general election to Hillary Clinton by over 2.8 million votes and won the Electoral College by 74 votes. On Dec. 14, electoral votes for the president of the United States will officially be cast in all 50 states. Elizabeth Warren wants to abolish the Electoral College.

Hellcat Rental Nyc, Live Sports App On Firestick, Something Like Jägermeister, Smart Electrician Led Shop Light Reviews, Bucky Larson: Born To Be A Star Stream, Ano Ang Waray, The Challenge Season 1 Winner, Did Metal Knight Killed Genos' Family, Home Of The Brave Song,

Browse other articles filed in News Both comments and pings are currently closed.